《领导艺术的中心规现》(Principle-Centered Leadership)[MP3]

  • 状态: 精华资源
  • 摘要:
  • 时间: 2005/06/22 16:45:50 发布 | 2005/06/22 16:45:50 更新
  • 分类: 资料  有声读物 


精华资源: 6

全部资源: 8

相关: 分享到新浪微博   转播到腾讯微博   分享到开心网   分享到人人   分享到QQ空间   订阅本资源RSS更新   美味书签  subtitle
英文名Principle-Centered Leadership

IPB Image
IPB Image


Principle-Centered Leadership by Stephen R. Covey

Review by Don W. Morishita, University of Idaho

Anyone who has read any of Covey's other books such as Seven Habits of Highly Effective
People and First Things First is familiar with his belief that the four basic needs of all people is
"to live, to love, to learn and to leave a legacy. This book also follows that tenet.

The message in this book is basically a very simple one, that is leadership skills and philosophy,
like living, must be centered around principles. Although Covey frequently refers to 'changing
paradigm' and 'new paradigm', hackneyed terms that we often hear regarding change, I felt this
book has much to offer for those interested in leadership philosophy.

Principle-Centered Leadership is described as a book exploring the natural laws that govern all
of our actions and how we can align ourselves with these laws to bring true power, focus, energy,
compassion, and integrity of our lives. In other words, it’s a book that reinforces and/or teaches
you the importance of living your life and your leadership with a solid set of moral principles.

Covey quotes an unnamed Japanese industrialist who stated, "Leadership is the art of mobilizing
and energizing the intellectual creative resources of all the people in the organization."

Covey describes 10 common dilemmas of organizations by presenting them as questions to the

1. How do we achieve a wise renewing balance between work and family?
2. How do we unleash the creativity, talent, and energy of the majority of the workforce
whose jobs neither require nor allow such use?
3. How do we create team spirit and harmony among departments and people who have
been criticizing and attacking each other for years while contending for scarce resources?
How to have peace and harmony?
4. How can we realize the choice between tough management and soft management that is
transcended by a management that is both tough and soft?
5. How can we have a culture characterized by change, flexibility, and continuous
improvement and still maintain a sense of stability and security?
6. How do we get people aligned with strategy so that everyone is committee to the strategy
as those who came up with it? How do we create ownership?
7. How can all people at all levels of organization internalize the principles of total quality
when they are so cynical, fatigued, and disillusioned from dealing with all of the past
8. How can we create a complementary team based on mutual respect when so few value
diversity and pluralism? Prejudice is pre-judgment.
9. How do we turn a mission statement into a constitution, the supreme guiding force of an
organization so that it has actual effect on a day-by-day basis? 10. How do we maintain control and yet give people freedom and autonomy that they really
need in order to be effective in their work?

He does not specifically address each of the dilemmas, which is a shame, because I was looking
for more direct answers to these questions.

Covey also describes four levels of natural laws: a) personal, cool.gif interpersonal, c) managerial, and
d) organizational as the heart of the principle-centered leadership paradigm.

Each level of the natural laws has key principles.
Personal- trustworthiness
Interpersonal- trust
Managerial- empowerment
Organizational- alignment

It is important to work with all of the natural laws principles. All of these natural laws are
interdependent and must be practiced together, not individually.

Gandhi is quoted as saying "A person cannot do right in one department of life while attempting to
do wrong in another department. Life is one indivisible whole."

Covey finally describes how principle-centered leadership evolved from other leadership forms
(paradigms as he calls them), such as:

1. Authoritarian leadership or management, which is probably the oldest style of leadership.

2. Human relationship management came into being sometime during the 1930s. It is a
benevolent form of leadership, where people are treated with kindness, respect, and
dignity. It is still the dominant management style in most organizations.

3. Human resource management began around 1960. It built upon human relationship
management and addresses how people are not only treated, but how they are developed
and how they are used.

4. Principle-centered leadership sees people in the whole sense (body, mind, and spirit). It
builds upon human relationship and human resource management and further tries to
understand what gives people meaning and what gives them a sense that their lives matter.

I'd recommend this book as a good leadership philosophy. If touchy-feely is not in your
personality profile, it may not be the book for you. However, I don't consider myself a
touch-feely person and I got a lot out of it.






(?) [公告]留口水、评论相关规则

  1. 类似“顶”、“沙发”之类没有营养的文字,对勤劳贡献的楼主来说是令人沮丧的反馈信息。
  2. 提问之前请再仔细看一遍楼主的说明,或许是您遗漏了。
  3. 勿催片。请相信驴友们对分享是富有激情的,如果确有更新版本,您一定能搜索到。
  4. 请勿到处挖坑绊人、招贴广告。既占空间让人厌烦,又没人会搭理,于人于己都无利。
  5. 如果您发现自己的评论不见了,请参考以上4条。