原包LOG日志
(注意:“峰值电平”为 66.6 %)
Karunesh / Colours Of Light
蔫耜钼钿: TEAC DV-W58G Adapter: 1 ID: 0
绣骅?黩屙?: 念耱钼屦睇?(C2: 溧, 翌黜 镱蝾? 溧, 悟觌屙桢 挲: 溧)
暑痧尻鲨 耢妁屙? 镳?黩屙梃: 0
扬铖钺眍耱?麒蜞螯 钺豚耱?Lead-in ?Lead-out : 湾?
蔓躅漤铋 纛痨囹: 马篁疱眄桢 WAV-铒屦圉梃
44.100 闽; 16 徼? 耱屦孱
酿筱桢 镟疣戾蝠?
青镱腠屙桢 镳铒簌屙睇?颀祜腩?蜩眍?: 泥
愉嚯屙桢 犭铌钼 ?蜩眍??磬鬣脲 ?觐眦?: 湾?
玉蜞眍怆屙睇?忭屮龛?ASPI-桧蝈痿彘?
锗疣牝屦桉蜩觇 滂囡噻铐?桤怆鬻屙? ?耦钺龛 钺 铠栳赅?
蔓狃囗睇?滂囡噻铐
褥 羿殡?D:\腆耦痍郳EAC\Karunesh - Colours Of Light.wav
翔觐恹?箴钼屙?66.6 %
枢麇耱忸 滂囡噻铐?100.0 %
CRC 4600FCE5
暑镨痤忄龛?.. OK
硒栳铌 礤 镳铊珙?
暑礤?铗鞲蜞
CUE索引
(原包cue的文件名与ape文件名不一致,少“1989”,且后缀为“wav”,请解压后自行更正,或参照如下)
REM DATE 1989
REM DISCID 840CCD0A
REM COMMENT "ExactAudioCopy v0.95b4"
CATALOG 1001045942005
PERFORMER "Karunesh"
TITLE "Colours Of Light"
FILE "Karunesh - 1989 - Colours Of Light.ape" WAVE
TRACK 01 AUDIO
TITLE "Japanese Spring"
PERFORMER "Karunesh"
INDEX 01 00:00:00
TRACK 02 AUDIO
TITLE "Sweet Dreams"
PERFORMER "Karunesh"
INDEX 00 05:51:05
INDEX 01 05:54:00
TRACK 03 AUDIO
TITLE "Dawnlight"
PERFORMER "Karunesh"
INDEX 00 10:49:15
INDEX 01 10:51:00
TRACK 04 AUDIO
TITLE "Galadriel"
PERFORMER "Karunesh"
INDEX 00 17:18:22
INDEX 01 17:22:00
TRACK 05 AUDIO
TITLE "Love Song"
PERFORMER "Karunesh"
INDEX 00 23:27:19
INDEX 01 23:31:00
TRACK 06 AUDIO
TITLE "Lightdance"
PERFORMER "Karunesh"
INDEX 00 27:50:18
INDEX 01 27:54:00
TRACK 07 AUDIO
TITLE "Magic Fields"
PERFORMER "Karunesh"
INDEX 00 33:55:17
INDEX 01 33:58:00
TRACK 08 AUDIO
TITLE "Fantasy in Blue"
PERFORMER "Karunesh"
INDEX 00 39:38:20
INDEX 01 39:40:00
TRACK 09 AUDIO
TITLE "Shabono"
PERFORMER "Karunesh"
INDEX 00 44:07:26
INDEX 01 44:11:00
TRACK 10 AUDIO
TITLE "The end of a day"
PERFORMER "Karunesh"
INDEX 00 49:35:27
INDEX 01 49:37:00








更多相关资源 >>
















观三千界 (管理员)
2009/04/02 16:43:47 1楼
举报
CDDA检测
/thumb.jpg)
/thumb.jpg)
CDDA检测通过,仅第2轨显示为“MPEG”,意思是该轨判断为有损,其频谱截图示例,从与本辑其他轨频谱图比较,其实较接近;分析原因可能是早期录音或录音的方式(查阅相关资料此CD最早的录制是1986年),也有可能是CD碟保存不妥(原抓轨日志里的“峰值电平”为 66.6 %,不知是否与此有关?),造成误差。通盘考量这点误差、小缺点是容许的;此例个人看法是音乐较平和、中性,或许软件测不到它用来判断真伪所依据的一些指标之故,可忽略之;另播放时长特短的歌(小于2分钟),也容易被该软件判为“UNKN”,尽管本来就是cdda的;当然个人以为软件也非全能,不能苛刻求全,所以本人也仅把此项检测作为考察编码的一个参考,而非全部;若然,结合音质本身、提供的cd包装、封面设计、印刷精美度,以及发布者人品、口碑(出处)等综合因素,会更稳妥些!
以上仅为个人观点供参考,请乐友们根据自己的实践经验甄别、选择下载;谢谢观赏。并再次致谢原发布人的无私分享!
第2轨频谱截图示例